First Amendment and Censorship
Background Information and summary:
Freedoms outlined in the First Amendment:
Exceptions to the First Amendment:
Hate speech is not protected under the First Amendment.
Schenck v. the United States is the case in which established the Clear and Present Danger Test. Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer were convicted of violating the Espionage Act by opposing the draft during WWI. Parameters of speech are often limited during wartime. This is why the Court found them guilty. Related cases in which protested the Espionage Act include Debs V. US and Frohwerk V. US.
The Clear and Present Danger test does not always hold up.
Brandenburg V. Ohio was a president case in which Clarence Bandonburg organized a Ku Klux Klan rally making anti-black and anti-Semitism remarks. He was found guilty under Ohio's Criminal Syndicalism law however this decision was later overturned by the Supreme Court issuing a news speech test for lawless action.
Other Exceptions to the First Amendment Include:
Blackmail:
Child Pornography:
Defaimation:
New York Times V. Sulivan was a landmark case in which a news outlet posted false statements about L.B Sulivan. The Court ruled that it is much more difficult for famous people and public officials to prove defamation because in order to do so they need to prove actual malice. It is important to understand that Libal is written Defamation while Slander is spoken.
Fighting Words:
Perjury:
Obscenity:
Miller V. California established the Miller test for obscenity with a variety of criteria. Obscene material must not be depicted as offensive and also have an educational or scientific purpose.
True Threats:
Watts V. US and Virginia V. Black
Government Agencies:
Government entities often monitor, regulate and restrict free speech
The Patriot Act:
My Thoughts on the First Amendment and Censorship:
https://www.fcc.gov/
https://apnews.com/hub/patriot-act


No comments:
Post a Comment